- Posts: 7
GTA V Reshade + framework crash
7 years 1 month ago #14 by julian
Allright, will use the complete package haha.
SMAA from ReShade + SweetFX is just as good in aliasing jaggies with no linearization as ReShade + framwork with the logarithmic depth buffer for GTA V?
In that case I'll just use ReShade + SweetFX instead of the whole framework, because I only used the logarithmic depth buffer of the framework
Replied by julian on topic GTA V Reshade + framework crash
There is no need to delete the lines or files. It is pre-processor commands, therefore you will gain nothing by deleting it but only have chances to break things .oO
SMAA does uses the depth buffer but not the linearization result.
Allright, will use the complete package haha.
SMAA from ReShade + SweetFX is just as good in aliasing jaggies with no linearization as ReShade + framwork with the logarithmic depth buffer for GTA V?
In that case I'll just use ReShade + SweetFX instead of the whole framework, because I only used the logarithmic depth buffer of the framework
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
7 years 1 month ago - 7 years 1 month ago #15 by Ganossa
If you only want to run SFX stuff, I suggest to turn all three performance options in Common_settings.cfg to 0 and run the entire framework like that. This way you get the -currently- best possible performance from what is available out there
See THIS POST for performance reference.
Replied by Ganossa on topic GTA V Reshade + framework crash
There is no need to delete the lines or files. It is pre-processor commands, therefore you will gain nothing by deleting it but only have chances to break things .oO
SMAA does uses the depth buffer but not the linearization result.
Allright, will use the complete package haha.
SMAA from ReShade + SweetFX is just as good in aliasing jaggies with no linearization as ReShade + framwork with the logarithmic depth buffer for GTA V?
In that case I'll just use ReShade + SweetFX instead of the whole framework, because I only used the logarithmic depth buffer of the framework
If you only want to run SFX stuff, I suggest to turn all three performance options in Common_settings.cfg to 0 and run the entire framework like that. This way you get the -currently- best possible performance from what is available out there
See THIS POST for performance reference.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
7 years 1 month ago #16 by julian
Replied by julian on topic GTA V Reshade + framework crash
With the framework enabled I only have a black screen when the game has laoded story mode...
And if I enable depthbuffer in ReShade + SweetFX (no framework) I see a white screen with a black box in the lower left...
A couple of days ago, with the framework (when it worked..), I could see the depth buffer correctly.
So ReShade + SweetFX does not use logarithmic depth. This means I also cannot use SMAA with depth (only color and luma).....
And if I enable depthbuffer in ReShade + SweetFX (no framework) I see a white screen with a black box in the lower left...
A couple of days ago, with the framework (when it worked..), I could see the depth buffer correctly.
So ReShade + SweetFX does not use logarithmic depth. This means I also cannot use SMAA with depth (only color and luma).....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
7 years 1 month ago - 7 years 1 month ago #17 by crosire
Replied by crosire on topic GTA V Reshade + framework crash
So ReShade + SweetFX does not use logarithmic depth. This means I also cannot use SMAA with depth (only color and luma).....Wrong =). Yes, SweetFX does not have the logaritmic depth buffer option, but SMAA doesn't need it. SMAA works with raw depth input and does not need linearization first.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.