3D Depth Map Based Stereoscopic Shader

Aelius Maximus wrote: Is a usable version of 2dto3dconv being uploaded at some point? The one you tested with "Stranger Things" perhaps?

The current one still show blank SBS image

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Aelius Maximus wrote: Is a usable version of 2dto3dconv being uploaded at some point? The one you tested with "Stranger Things" perhaps?

The current one still show blank SBS image

I'm still working on it. conversion is not easy.

Aelius Maximus wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Aelius Maximus wrote: Is a usable version of 2dto3dconv being uploaded at some point? The one you tested with "Stranger Things" perhaps?

The current one still show blank SBS image

I'm still working on it. conversion is not easy.

I understand, take your time.

Out of curiosity, Was it the 2dto3dconv shader that the Laplace and Radial Blur code helped make better?

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Sh1nRa358 wrote: @BlueSkyKnight: Do you have a version of these that work with reshade 1.1.0f1? I don't want to switch from that yet because I have a couple of other shaders I like that doesn't work correctly with anything above it. I haven't tried yet but would I need to change anything to make this work or will it work right out the box for that reshade version?

I will port the new one to 2.0 then you can port it over to 1.1. I do this when I get back from the eye doctor to day.

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Sh1nRa358 wrote: @BlueSkyKnight: Do you have a version of these that work with reshade 1.1.0f1? I don't want to switch from that yet because I have a couple of other shaders I like that doesn't work correctly with anything above it. I haven't tried yet but would I need to change anything to make this work or will it work right out the box for that reshade version?

I will port the new one to 2.0 then you can port it over to 1.1. I do this when I get back from the eye doctor to day.

Ok I have it Back ported to 2.0 Here is the link
www.mediafire.com/download/97w9q5a3dha9c...3D_v1.8.5_Repack.zip

Should Be easyer to back port it to 1.1 now.

Back Port Tested with Alien Isolation

Please enjoy.

x8009 wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Sh1nRa358 wrote: @BlueSkyKnight: Do you have a version of these that work with reshade 1.1.0f1? I don't want to switch from that yet because I have a couple of other shaders I like that doesn't work correctly with anything above it. I haven't tried yet but would I need to change anything to make this work or will it work right out the box for that reshade version?

I will port the new one to 2.0 then you can port it over to 1.1. I do this when I get back from the eye doctor to day.

Ok I have it Back ported to 2.0 Here is the link
www.mediafire.com/download/97w9q5a3dha9c...3D_v1.8.5_Repack.zip

Should Be easyer to back port it to 1.1 now.

Back Port Tested with Alien Isolation

Please enjoy.

Blueskyknight ,

How do you know the best depth out of the 20 ? could you check Need for speed Rivals for me and tell me what's the best ? so I'll know what to look for .
Just how did you find the best depth for all the other games ?

Thanks

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

x8009 wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Sh1nRa358 wrote: @BlueSkyKnight: Do you have a version of these that work with reshade 1.1.0f1? I don't want to switch from that yet because I have a couple of other shaders I like that doesn't work correctly with anything above it. I haven't tried yet but would I need to change anything to make this work or will it work right out the box for that reshade version?

I will port the new one to 2.0 then you can port it over to 1.1. I do this when I get back from the eye doctor to day.

Ok I have it Back ported to 2.0 Here is the link
www.mediafire.com/download/97w9q5a3dha9c...3D_v1.8.5_Repack.zip

Should Be easyer to back port it to 1.1 now.


Please enjoy.

Blueskyknight ,

How do you know the best depth out of the 20 ? could you check Need for speed Rivals for me and tell me what's the best ? so I'll know what to look for .
Just how did you find the best depth for all the other games ?

Thanks

I do one of Two things.
1.
Now since I have so many Depth Maps. I first search in "Depth Map View mode," and where the Depth map shows up from 1-20. I then wright down the number.
I then turn off Depth Map View mode and enable 3D mode in the shader and my 3D TV. I then go though my list I have written down. I toggle between each one.
What ever feels like has the right amount of pop and depth I then circle the Depth map number.
Though the process of elimination I will eventually find the best one.
2.
I use Custom Depth map 1-5 By adjusting the near and far. I go one by one from 1-5 and change the Near and Far for each one Till I see a Depth Map I like.
Once found then I go back in to 3D mode in the shader and my 3DTV. Back in 3D mode I then I adjust the Near And Far setting slowly till I adjust the Depth Map to my personal preference. Once I find what I like I write it down then go in to the shader and Add the DM to the main list.

x8009 wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

x8009 wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Sh1nRa358 wrote: @BlueSkyKnight: Do you have a version of these that work with reshade 1.1.0f1? I don't want to switch from that yet because I have a couple of other shaders I like that doesn't work correctly with anything above it. I haven't tried yet but would I need to change anything to make this work or will it work right out the box for that reshade version?

I will port the new one to 2.0 then you can port it over to 1.1. I do this when I get back from the eye doctor to day.

Ok I have it Back ported to 2.0 Here is the link
www.mediafire.com/download/97w9q5a3dha9c...3D_v1.8.5_Repack.zip

Should Be easyer to back port it to 1.1 now.


Please enjoy.

Blueskyknight ,

How do you know the best depth out of the 20 ? could you check Need for speed Rivals for me and tell me what's the best ? so I'll know what to look for .
Just how did you find the best depth for all the other games ?

Thanks

I do one of Two things.
1.
Now since I have so many Depth Maps. I first search in "Depth Map View mode," and where the Depth map shows up from 1-20. I then wright down the number.
I then turn off Depth Map View mode and enable 3D mode in the shader and my 3D TV. I then go though my list I have written down. I toggle between each one.
What ever feels like has the right amount of pop and depth I then circle the Depth map number.
Though the process of elimination I will eventually find the best one.
2.
I use Custom Depth map 1-5 By adjusting the near and far. I go one by one from 1-5 and change the Near and Far for each one Till I see a Depth Map I like.
Once found then I go back in to 3D mode in the shader and my 3DTV. Back in 3D mode I then I adjust the Near And Far setting slowly till I adjust the Depth Map to my personal preference. Once I find what I like I write it down then go in to the shader and Add the DM to the main list.

Thanks ! so it is always prefered to use custom depth than the normal ? because custom usually fix some weird tearing on fonts and such. in assassins creed for example. but why you recommend to use in gta v 12 if I remember and not custom ? even though it looks incredible awesome 3d effect. it has problem with the fonts and some menus they move and break while I move .

nieda113 wrote: Hi , i just wanted to know how users impressions are on using 3d depth map vs other approaches like nvidia 3d tv play, tridef vorpx and vireio.
I am asking that because its obvious that people have different eyesight. I wanted to know if the 3d impression of the depth map is equal for all users or if the have a better impression on the others named above. For me, i bareley see a difference ( maybe i am not too sensitve for 3d)how about you guys?



THX

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

x8009 wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

x8009 wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Sh1nRa358 wrote: @BlueSkyKnight: Do you have a version of these that work with reshade 1.1.0f1? I don't want to switch from that yet because I have a couple of other shaders I like that doesn't work correctly with anything above it. I haven't tried yet but would I need to change anything to make this work or will it work right out the box for that reshade version?

I will port the new one to 2.0 then you can port it over to 1.1. I do this when I get back from the eye doctor to day.

Ok I have it Back ported to 2.0 Here is the link
www.mediafire.com/download/97w9q5a3dha9c...3D_v1.8.5_Repack.zip

Should Be easyer to back port it to 1.1 now.


Please enjoy.

Blueskyknight ,

How do you know the best depth out of the 20 ? could you check Need for speed Rivals for me and tell me what's the best ? so I'll know what to look for .
Just how did you find the best depth for all the other games ?

Thanks

I do one of Two things.
1.
Now since I have so many Depth Maps. I first search in "Depth Map View mode," and where the Depth map shows up from 1-20. I then wright down the number.
I then turn off Depth Map View mode and enable 3D mode in the shader and my 3D TV. I then go though my list I have written down. I toggle between each one.
What ever feels like has the right amount of pop and depth I then circle the Depth map number.
Though the process of elimination I will eventually find the best one.
2.
I use Custom Depth map 1-5 By adjusting the near and far. I go one by one from 1-5 and change the Near and Far for each one Till I see a Depth Map I like.
Once found then I go back in to 3D mode in the shader and my 3DTV. Back in 3D mode I then I adjust the Near And Far setting slowly till I adjust the Depth Map to my personal preference. Once I find what I like I write it down then go in to the shader and Add the DM to the main list.

Thanks ! so it is always prefered to use custom depth than the normal ? because custom usually fix some weird tearing on fonts and such. in assassins creed for example. but why you recommend to use in gta v 12 if I remember and not custom ? even though it looks incredible awesome 3d effect. it has problem with the fonts and some menus they move and break while I move .

The depth map for AC Unity was made first. It can be a number of things. My eyes where tired. I didn't catch the Font problem. The new blur filter is not catching that font in that game for some reason. Since updating I still need to go back to some depth maps to check them out with the new code.

Also keep in mind my left eye not up to par with my right eye. I have a defect in my left so sometimes I may not catch things.

That's why I encourage people to share there settings. You can always post here your Custom Depth Map Number also Near and Far settings.

I love all kinds of feed back good or bad BTW. If any one has any questions or suggestions. Please feel free to ask.

BlueSkyKnight wrote: Ok so I settled for Plenoptic Depth Mapping for the 2D to 3D conversion.

using the Virtual pin hole cam and Virtual Plenoptic lenses.
www.eecis.udel.edu/~zyu/MCP2013/MCP%202013.pdf

I was able to do to make the outlook look like this.

The reason for the color is the HVS color calculation for Depth map assist.
But, heres the code with out that.

float3 Pinhole(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target //pinhole to array
{
float micro_size = 0.050;
float shift_x= -0.5;
float shift_y= -0.5;
float slope = 1;
float2 q = texcoord .xy / micro_size;
float2 p = floor(q);
float2 offset = q - p;
float2 shift = float2(shift_x, shift_y);
return tex2D(BackBuffer ,p*micro_size+shift+(slope*offset) );
}

Now I would like to know how to put Humpty Dumpty back together again to generate the Depth map.
If any one can help me please do....

This same code can be used for a DOF shader.

www.slideshare.net/ZeeKhattak/plenoptic-...ertation-zee-khattak

*Side Note* I made the array too large...........

Aelius Maximus wrote:
This is great news, even if it's something you had to settle for.

How would this method compare to the other ones considered?

It seems like an intensive process, how much will it impact performance?

float3 Pinhole(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target
{
float slope = 0.250;
float micro_size = slope/4;
float shift_x = -0.100;
float shift_y = -0.100;
float2 q = texcoord .xy / micro_size;
float2 p = floor(q);
float2 offset = q - p;
float2 shift = float2(shift_x, shift_y);
return tex2D(SamplerHSV,p*micro_size+shift+(slope*offset) );
}

float3 Render(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target
{
float M = 0.016;
float mu = 0.063;
float2 offest = float2(-0.002,-0.002);

float2 x_mu = texcoord.xy/mu;
float2 p = floor(x_mu);
float2 q = (x_mu-p) * M;
float2 qp = q + 0.5*(mu-M);

float4 colXY = float4(0,0,0,0);
for(int i= -1; i <=1; ++i)
{
for(int j= -1; j <=1; ++j)
{
float2 ij = float2(float(i), float(j));
float2 dq = qp - ij*M;
float2 fx = (p + ij)*mu+dq + offest;

colXY +=tex2D(SamplerDM,fx);
}
}
return colXY/5;
}

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Aelius Maximus wrote:
This is great news, even if it's something you had to settle for.

How would this method compare to the other ones considered?

It seems like an intensive process, how much will it impact performance?

Not Too bad on performance.

I was able to re-merge the image again. so that's something.

I am going to list the code here.
To create the Plenoptic image.

float3 Pinhole(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target
{
float slope = 0.250;
float micro_size = slope/4;
float shift_x = -0.100;
float shift_y = -0.100;
float2 q = texcoord .xy / micro_size;
float2 p = floor(q);
float2 offset = q - p;
float2 shift = float2(shift_x, shift_y);
return tex2D(SamplerHSV,p*micro_size+shift+(slope*offset) );
}

Too recombine the Plenoptic image.

float3 Render(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target
{
float M = 0.016;
float mu = 0.063;
float2 offest = float2(-0.002,-0.002);

float2 x_mu = texcoord.xy/mu;
float2 p = floor(x_mu);
float2 q = (x_mu-p) * M;
float2 qp = q + 0.5*(mu-M);

float4 colXY = float4(0,0,0,0);
for(int i= -1; i <=1; ++i)
{
for(int j= -1; j <=1; ++j)
{
float2 ij = float2(float(i), float(j));
float2 dq = qp - ij*M;
float2 fx = (p + ij)*mu+dq + offest;

colXY +=tex2D(SamplerDM,fx);
}
}
return colXY/5;
}

Now I am working on the code that goes be tween the two.

IT's coming along though...... at least we are getting closer to a working Depth Map generation. Now I think I can got one of 3 routs. The Laplacian method, Gaussian method, or estimate by Illumination. I could do a combination of them but Im sure performance may tank.

I am uploading a really really Rough Draft of a semi working one. It's already showing a little progress.

Aelius Maximus wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Aelius Maximus wrote:
This is great news, even if it's something you had to settle for.

How would this method compare to the other ones considered?

It seems like an intensive process, how much will it impact performance?

Not Too bad on performance.

I was able to re-merge the image again. so that's something.

I am going to list the code here.
To create the Plenoptic image.

float3 Pinhole(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target
{
float slope = 0.250;
float micro_size = slope/4;
float shift_x = -0.100;
float shift_y = -0.100;
float2 q = texcoord .xy / micro_size;
float2 p = floor(q);
float2 offset = q - p;
float2 shift = float2(shift_x, shift_y);
return tex2D(SamplerHSV,p*micro_size+shift+(slope*offset) );
}

Too recombine the Plenoptic image.

float3 Render(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target
{
float M = 0.016;
float mu = 0.063;
float2 offest = float2(-0.002,-0.002);

float2 x_mu = texcoord.xy/mu;
float2 p = floor(x_mu);
float2 q = (x_mu-p) * M;
float2 qp = q + 0.5*(mu-M);

float4 colXY = float4(0,0,0,0);
for(int i= -1; i <=1; ++i)
{
for(int j= -1; j <=1; ++j)
{
float2 ij = float2(float(i), float(j));
float2 dq = qp - ij*M;
float2 fx = (p + ij)*mu+dq + offest;

colXY +=tex2D(SamplerDM,fx);
}
}
return colXY/5;
}

Now I am working on the code that goes be tween the two.

IT's coming along though...... at least we are getting closer to a working Depth Map generation. Now I think I can got one of 3 routs. The Laplacian method, Gaussian method, or estimate by Illumination. I could do a combination of them but Im sure performance may tank.

I am uploading a really really Rough Draft of a semi working one. It's already showing a little progress.

Is it semi working as in it can be tried out? because on my end it crashes with every game i launch? Was looking forward to trying it out

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Aelius Maximus wrote:

BlueSkyKnight wrote:

Aelius Maximus wrote:
This is great news, even if it's something you had to settle for.

How would this method compare to the other ones considered?

It seems like an intensive process, how much will it impact performance?

Not Too bad on performance.

I was able to re-merge the image again. so that's something.

I am going to list the code here.
To create the Plenoptic image.

float3 Pinhole(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target
{
float slope = 0.250;
float micro_size = slope/4;
float shift_x = -0.100;
float shift_y = -0.100;
float2 q = texcoord .xy / micro_size;
float2 p = floor(q);
float2 offset = q - p;
float2 shift = float2(shift_x, shift_y);
return tex2D(SamplerHSV,p*micro_size+shift+(slope*offset) );
}

Too recombine the Plenoptic image.

float3 Render(float2 texcoord : TEXCOORD0) : SV_Target
{
float M = 0.016;
float mu = 0.063;
float2 offest = float2(-0.002,-0.002);

float2 x_mu = texcoord.xy/mu;
float2 p = floor(x_mu);
float2 q = (x_mu-p) * M;
float2 qp = q + 0.5*(mu-M);

float4 colXY = float4(0,0,0,0);
for(int i= -1; i <=1; ++i)
{
for(int j= -1; j <=1; ++j)
{
float2 ij = float2(float(i), float(j));
float2 dq = qp - ij*M;
float2 fx = (p + ij)*mu+dq + offest;

colXY +=tex2D(SamplerDM,fx);
}
}
return colXY/5;
}

Now I am working on the code that goes be tween the two.

IT's coming along though...... at least we are getting closer to a working Depth Map generation. Now I think I can got one of 3 routs. The Laplacian method, Gaussian method, or estimate by Illumination. I could do a combination of them but Im sure performance may tank.

I am uploading a really really Rough Draft of a semi working one. It's already showing a little progress.

Is it semi working as in it can be tried out? because on my end it crashes with every game i launch? Was looking forward to trying it out

The uploads are not in usable working order. They are just saved code.

I also have learned that This turned out to be a lot harder then expected. I would need help.