3D Depth Map Based Stereoscopic Shader
- Devil Master
I will.BlueSkyKnight wrote: Maybe ask the Devs to allow more common settings.
Wow, it works! And it's even BETTER than the iz3D drivers, because your shader displays the sky at the correct depth!BlueSkyKnight wrote: Unreal Gold with v227 patch.
Use the DX9 render
install Rehsade 3.0 to System folder select DX9.
In Unreal Set your res and the go to advance settings.
Turn Off AA and go back in to the game.
Start a game.
Shift F2
Set up my shader in reshade.
Depth map is 8
On an unrelated topic, I see some screenshots here that only show the depth map. How can I grab that kind of screenshot myself?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- x8009
Devil Master wrote:
I will.BlueSkyKnight wrote: Maybe ask the Devs to allow more common settings.
Wow, it works! And it's even BETTER than the iz3D drivers, because your shader displays the sky at the correct depth!BlueSkyKnight wrote: Unreal Gold with v227 patch.
Use the DX9 render
install Rehsade 3.0 to System folder select DX9.
In Unreal Set your res and the go to advance settings.
Turn Off AA and go back in to the game.
Start a game.
Shift F2
Set up my shader in reshade.
Depth map is 8
On an unrelated topic, I see some screenshots here that only show the depth map. How can I grab that kind of screenshot myself?
You enable Depth_Map_View to ON and you take Screenshot with PrintScreen Button . it's in the settings in Reshade 3.0 Tab
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aelius Maximus
Devil Master wrote:
I will.BlueSkyKnight wrote: Maybe ask the Devs to allow more common settings.
Wow, it works! And it's even BETTER than the iz3D drivers, because your shader displays the sky at the correct depth!BlueSkyKnight wrote: Unreal Gold with v227 patch.
Use the DX9 render
install Rehsade 3.0 to System folder select DX9.
In Unreal Set your res and the go to advance settings.
Turn Off AA and go back in to the game.
Start a game.
Shift F2
Set up my shader in reshade.
Depth map is 8
This is because it utilizes ReShade depth buffer for the 3D effect
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aelius Maximus
BlueSkyKnight wrote:
Aelius Maximus wrote: The progress this shader has made is fantastic. I'm still running 1.8.0, what's the difference in performance since that release and 1.9.0?
1.9.0 will come in 3 variants.
small changes to the code. from 1.8.0 to 1.9.0. on the normal one that and convergence slider. This also means I removed HMD and Anaglypth modes.
But, with the one for HMD and Anaglyph are more specialized.
I did this because, Each one requires different settings different kind of attention.
with so many Anaglyph modes out there. This one really needs one shader all to it's own.
The HMD one mainly for VR. This will have a lot of striped features and will focus on speed. So blur of depth map will be removed.
Okay, i think i will opt for the HMD one. As i need as much performance as possible. Which was the last shader version to be backported to Reshade 2.0? As i believe you're are doing that for every release now i think?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
Aelius Maximus wrote:
BlueSkyKnight wrote:
Aelius Maximus wrote: The progress this shader has made is fantastic. I'm still running 1.8.0, what's the difference in performance since that release and 1.9.0?
1.9.0 will come in 3 variants.
small changes to the code. from 1.8.0 to 1.9.0. on the normal one that and convergence slider. This also means I removed HMD and Anaglypth modes.
But, with the one for HMD and Anaglyph are more specialized.
I did this because, Each one requires different settings different kind of attention.
with so many Anaglyph modes out there. This one really needs one shader all to it's own.
The HMD one mainly for VR. This will have a lot of striped features and will focus on speed. So blur of depth map will be removed.
Okay, i think i will opt for the HMD one. As i need as much performance as possible. Which was the last shader version to be backported to Reshade 2.0? As i believe you're are doing that for every release now i think?
1.8.9 was the last shader backported to 2.0. 1.9.0 Is still being worked on. This shader is taking longer because I am trying to Optimize it now.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
HelpMeSomebody wrote: Got it working with DOOM! An OpenGL game in 3D! Can't believe it. Thanks so much BlueSkyKnight!
Are there any other settings I should adjust for DOOM besides DM and Depth Map Enhancement?
What do the blur settings do, exactly? Can't find an explanation. Is it the blurred edges around your weapon?
Not sure. But, may want to use radial blur.
If you want to know what Blur Really does.
Blur is really the Name I give to the process of Disocclusion masking. To deal with Occlusion problems. I guess I should Rename this to it's proper name. Because when I say blur It's starting to confuse people.
Now that the cat out of the bag.
Disocclusion Code Optimizations added to 1.9.0 This update should make 1.9.0 faster then 1.8.0. **should**
Disocclusion Code will be adjusted against 1.8.9 so keep in mind this is a time taking process based on different games.
So I need to match the quality to 1.8.9 will take me some time.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
x8009 wrote: I'll see if I can send you some of the Alternate in email. some of them are almost identical almost all, some are blacker , some are whiter, but this is the most correct if I don't need the more far to be whiter and more black to the near.
What's the different between the HMD one to the 1.9.0 ? Quality ? if the performance is better what could affect it ?
1.9.0 I am working on Disocclusion masking Code that's why It changes a lot.
The HMD one does not have Disocclusion masking.
You may not want to use 1.9.0 until I match the settings. This will take me a day or two.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aelius Maximus
BlueSkyKnight wrote:
Aelius Maximus wrote:
BlueSkyKnight wrote:
Aelius Maximus wrote: The progress this shader has made is fantastic. I'm still running 1.8.0, what's the difference in performance since that release and 1.9.0?
1.9.0 will come in 3 variants.
small changes to the code. from 1.8.0 to 1.9.0. on the normal one that and convergence slider. This also means I removed HMD and Anaglypth modes.
But, with the one for HMD and Anaglyph are more specialized.
I did this because, Each one requires different settings different kind of attention.
with so many Anaglyph modes out there. This one really needs one shader all to it's own.
The HMD one mainly for VR. This will have a lot of striped features and will focus on speed. So blur of depth map will be removed.
Okay, i think i will opt for the HMD one. As i need as much performance as possible. Which was the last shader version to be backported to Reshade 2.0? As i believe you're are doing that for every release now i think?
1.8.9 was the last shader backported to 2.0. 1.9.0 Is still being worked on. This shader is taking longer because I am trying to Optimize it now.
Okay, thanks, where exactly are the ReShade 2.0 versions being uploaded to?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
Aelius Maximus wrote:
BlueSkyKnight wrote:
Aelius Maximus wrote:
BlueSkyKnight wrote:
Aelius Maximus wrote: The progress this shader has made is fantastic. I'm still running 1.8.0, what's the difference in performance since that release and 1.9.0?
1.9.0 will come in 3 variants.
small changes to the code. from 1.8.0 to 1.9.0. on the normal one that and convergence slider. This also means I removed HMD and Anaglypth modes.
But, with the one for HMD and Anaglyph are more specialized.
I did this because, Each one requires different settings different kind of attention.
with so many Anaglyph modes out there. This one really needs one shader all to it's own.
The HMD one mainly for VR. This will have a lot of striped features and will focus on speed. So blur of depth map will be removed.
Okay, i think i will opt for the HMD one. As i need as much performance as possible. Which was the last shader version to be backported to Reshade 2.0? As i believe you're are doing that for every release now i think?
1.8.9 was the last shader backported to 2.0. 1.9.0 Is still being worked on. This shader is taking longer because I am trying to Optimize it now.
Okay, thanks, where exactly are the ReShade 2.0 versions being uploaded to?
1.9.0 not ready to be ported back to ReShade 2.0.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HelpMeSomebody
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
HelpMeSomebody wrote: Is there a way to increase the sense of depth between your weapon and the ground, say? I've been tweaking DOOM and everything looks great but whenever I look down there seems to be no separation between my weapon and the ground ...
Yes. But, you need change the depth map or make your own.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HelpMeSomebody
EDIT: I forgot to ask: is there a way to enlarge the image when using Polynomial Barrel Distortion? It looks great but leaves too large of a border around the image on my VR HMD.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
HelpMeSomebody wrote: Okay, I'll try it! Thanks as always for all your outstanding work.
EDIT: I forgot to ask: is there a way to enlarge the image when using Polynomial Barrel Distortion? It looks great but leaves too large of a border around the image on my VR HMD.
yes
Horizontal & Vertical now works in side by side and in Polynomial Barrel Distortion. Since this was asked for before.
Also if you have any request please tell me now.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HelpMeSomebody
BlueSkyKnight wrote:
HelpMeSomebody wrote: Okay, I'll try it! Thanks as always for all your outstanding work.
EDIT: I forgot to ask: is there a way to enlarge the image when using Polynomial Barrel Distortion? It looks great but leaves too large of a border around the image on my VR HMD.
yes
Horizontal & Vertical now works in side by side and in Polynomial Barrel Distortion. Since this was asked for before.
Also if you have any request please tell me now.
Thanks! The only thing I can think of is aspect ratio correction. Some games won't run correctly in an 8:9 ratio, so you have to run them at 1080p, which messes up the aspect ratio. Fortran made a ReShade that allows 1080p to look correct in SBS 3D. Here is the thread:
www.mtbs3d.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=120&t=21174
And this is a direct link to his ReShade version
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/916762/3D%20...%20FOR%20RESHADE.zip
If you could add aspect ratio correction to your project, that would be awesome. Or if you could tell us how to use both ReShades together, that would work too.
If you don't want to do this, I totally understand and will again thank you for offering us this great program for free!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
HelpMeSomebody wrote:
BlueSkyKnight wrote:
HelpMeSomebody wrote: Okay, I'll try it! Thanks as always for all your outstanding work.
EDIT: I forgot to ask: is there a way to enlarge the image when using Polynomial Barrel Distortion? It looks great but leaves too large of a border around the image on my VR HMD.
yes
Horizontal & Vertical now works in side by side and in Polynomial Barrel Distortion. Since this was asked for before.
Also if you have any request please tell me now.
Thanks! The only thing I can think of is aspect ratio correction. Some games won't run correctly in an 8:9 ratio, so you have to run them at 1080p, which messes up the aspect ratio. Fortran made a ReShade that allows 1080p to look correct in SBS 3D. Here is the thread:
www.mtbs3d.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=120&t=21174
And this is a direct link to his ReShade version
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/916762/3D%20...%20FOR%20RESHADE.zip
If you could add aspect ratio correction to your project, that would be awesome. Or if you could tell us how to use both ReShades together, that would work too.
If you don't want to do this, I totally understand and will again thank you for offering us this great program for free!
I can mimic what that aspect ratio correction does. But, Polynomial Barrel Distortion is superior vs chromatic abbreviation + barrel distortion. Polynomial Barrel Distortion cam be adjusted against lens you have. Polynomial Barrel Distortion just not easy too use if you don't know what your doing.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HelpMeSomebody
Depth slider increases depth the higher the value, but at the cost of blurriness around the edges of objects? Is there any way to mitigate for this besides reducing depth? Does the blur slider help with this? Type of blur?
It's a lot of fun, working with your ReShade. I spend much more time tweaking it than I do actually playing games now. Fallout 4 looks better than ever now with your latest version. And graphical effects that are lost or corrupted with Tridef seem untouched by your shader ...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- nieda113
THX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Proxish
A predetermined setting for the aspect ratio's I suggested in a previous post would be great too so people don't need to adjust numbers and can instead select an aspect ratio correction and then set their resolution in-game to match the aspect ratio correction.
You could then add in the ability for people to tweak curvature to suit their HMD and once the community agrees on a setting that works for their HMD, you can implement that as the stock , HDK2, Vive & Oculus settings for curvature
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
HelpMeSomebody wrote: Smaller numbers with PBD seem to make it larger while larger numbers shrink it, as far as I can tell? Tried experimenting with it but I think for the lenses in my HMD it might be better to leave it off.
Depth slider increases depth the higher the value, but at the cost of blurriness around the edges of objects? Is there any way to mitigate for this besides reducing depth? Does the blur slider help with this? Type of blur?
It's a lot of fun, working with your ReShade. I spend much more time tweaking it than I do actually playing games now. Fallout 4 looks better than ever now with your latest version. And graphical effects that are lost or corrupted with Tridef seem untouched by your shader ...
The Blur helped with the harsh warping in the image aka halo effect.
Try Finishing some games some times.....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BlueSkyKnight
- Topic Author
Proxish wrote: I just wanted to add to what HelpMeSomebody said, and say that when it comes to the 1.9 HMD version, the only things that it should need is more adjustable eye separation and the ability to bring the eyes closer together too, as mine is inverting my eyes at anything lower than -110 to -150.
A predetermined setting for the aspect ratio's I suggested in a previous post would be great too so people don't need to adjust numbers and can instead select an aspect ratio correction and then set their resolution in-game to match the aspect ratio correction.
You could then add in the ability for people to tweak curvature to suit their HMD and once the community agrees on a setting that works for their HMD, you can implement that as the stock , HDK2, Vive & Oculus settings for curvature
You do know I don't have the head sets....... It's hard for me check my work.
This will take time as I,m guessing at most the the problems I face.
Give me time.
or the hardware since it's hard to develop on hardware you don't have.
Why did you think I ordered the anaglyph glasses. it was so that I was able to work on that faster.
That only took me a day once i got the hardware.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.